Skip to content

Appeal evidence

How the appeal route relates to the outcome

Every planning appeal decided in England is handled by one of three procedures. They do not carry the same outcome rates, and the difference is large. These are counted from the Planning Inspectorate’s own published decisions between 1 January 2021 and 31 July 2026.

The route does not cause the outcome. Inquiries take the larger, better-evidenced cases, which would be stronger by any route — see below before quoting these.

ProcedureAllowed in fullDismissedDecided
Written Representations27% (13,460)35,21648,990
Hearing47% (1,218)1,3602,610
Inquiry64% (706)3951,103

52,703 decided planning appeals. Split decisions count in the total but not as allowed in full, which is why the two columns do not sum to it. A procedure with fewer than 100 decisions is not listed rather than shown with a rate drawn from a handful of cases.

And what kind of development it was

The categories are the Inspectorate’s own, not ours. A category with fewer than 100 decisions is not listed.

Development typeAllowed in fullDecided
Minor Dwellings22% (5,089)23,019
Other minor developments34% (3,392)10,022
Change of use31% (2,848)9,143
Householder developments32% (917)2,832
Major dwellings46% (1,288)2,804
Minor retail and services30% (490)1,646
Minor general industry/storage/warehousing35% (325)929
Other Major Developments46% (388)845
Unknown47% (197)420
Minor traveller and caravan pitches57% (188)328
Minor offices/R&D/light industry27% (69)252
Major general industry/storage/warehousing51% (105)207
Major retail and services37% (42)115

The spread here is the point. A figure covering every appeal at once is the average of these rows, and matching a scheme to it rather than to its own row will mislead in whichever direction that row sits.

And when it was decided

Year decidedAllowed in fullDecided
202128% (2,531)8,954
202228% (2,502)8,790
202328% (2,688)9,435
202428% (2,841)10,055
202531% (3,193)10,232
2026 — part year only31% (1,629)5,237

2026 covers only part of the year, so its smaller count is the window ending rather than a fall in appeals. The policy background moved within this period, so a rate pooled across all of it is not a description of any single year in it.

Read this as a pattern, not as a lever

The obvious conclusion — ask for an inquiry and improve your odds — does not follow from these figures, and acting on it would cost you time and money for nothing. The procedure is chosen to suit the appeal: inquiries are used for larger, more complex and more heavily evidenced cases, often with counsel and expert witnesses. Those cases would be stronger whichever route they took. What the table shows is that different kinds of appeal take different routes, not that the route improves the appeal.

The Inspectorate decides the procedure, using published criteria, and a request for an inquiry is not granted on request.

What this does not tell you

  • Nothing about a particular site. Appeal outcomes turn on the development, the policy position and the evidence, none of which is in these counts.
  • Nothing about the future. This is what happened to appeals already decided in this window; it is not a forecast, and the policy background has moved within it.
  • Nothing about appeals still undecided, withdrawn or turned away. Those are excluded from the rates above rather than counted as dismissals.
  • Planning appeals only. Enforcement, advertisement, rights of way and common land cases are decided on different tests and are not included.

Appeal outcomes for a specific council

We publish allowed and dismissed counts for 274 English authorities, on the same basis as the table above, alongside their measured decision times and Housing Delivery Test position.

Find your council

Source: Planning Inspectorate appeals database, England only, Open Government Licence v3.0, release of 2026-08-31. Counted by PF & Co. We publish counts, never case records: no site addresses, no appellant or agent names.